Cross-jurisdictional monitoring
Monitor US, France, EU, and UK policy in one verified feed
One feed, one record schema, 5 jurisdictions. Changes that relate to each other across borders arrive as one event, with each source document linked.
99.5% field-level accuracy · Source URL, timestamp and verifier ID on every record · US federal, 50 states, France, EU, UK
Traced record
Délibération CNIL n° 2026-041 relative aux traitements de données
Joined signals
- Watchlist 'EU data protection'
- Pipeline 'Privacy-Ops'
Your obligations cross borders. Most monitoring does not.
A rule adopted in Brussels, a consultation opened by the FCA, and a bill filed in Sacramento can all touch the same obligation. Monitored separately they arrive as 3 alerts on 3 schedules, in 2 languages, in 3 different shapes.
Reading foreign primary sources through a general-purpose model is its own risk. Stanford RegLab measured hallucination rates of 69% to 88% on specific legal queries against leading language models (Dahl et al., 2024). That is why low-confidence records here route to a person before release, and why the verifier ID is on the record.
- Hallucination rate of leading models on specific legal queries
- 69% to 88%Hallucination rate of leading models on specific legal queriesStanford RegLab, Dahl et al., 2024
- Jurisdictions normalised to one record schema
- 5Jurisdictions normalised to one record schemaMatterwire coverage
- Field-level accuracy across every jurisdiction
- 99.5%Field-level accuracy across every jurisdictionMatterwire SLA
One data standard across borders
The same record everywhere
A French délibération and a US proposed rule carry identical fields: source URL, capture timestamp, verifier ID, confidence, change type and effective date.
Native source, English record
The record is delivered in English and keeps the original-language source text alongside it, so a reader can check the wording that was actually published.
Cross-border correlation
Related changes join into a single event. An EU delegated act and the UK consultation that responds to it appear on the same record rather than as two alerts.
One watchlist, every jurisdiction
A watchlist is written once and applies across all 5 jurisdictions. Adding a jurisdiction does not mean rebuilding the watchlist.
A French record, in the same shape as every other
Captured from Légifrance at 11:02 Paris time, classified, and reviewed by VER-0207 because confidence sat below the release threshold. The source URL resolves to the Journal Officiel text.
Traced record
Délibération CNIL n° 2026-041 relative aux traitements de données
Joined signals
- Watchlist 'EU data protection'
- Pipeline 'Privacy-Ops'
Where the feed reaches
Five jurisdictions, grouped by region. Every one is delivered through the same verified, source-traceable record structure.
North America
2 jurisdictions- US-FEDUnited States, federalCongress and the federal agencies, from introduced bill to final rule.
- US-STUnited States, all 50 statesEvery state legislature and state regulatory body, on one record schema.
Europe
3 jurisdictions- FRFranceParliamentary texts and the regulators, in French, delivered in English.
- EUEuropean UnionThe Commission, Parliament and Council, plus the European supervisory authorities.
- GBUnited KingdomWestminster and the UK regulators, including the devolved bodies.
Correlation across borders
When a change in one jurisdiction relates to a change in another, Matterwire joins them and shows the link. You see one connected event with both sources attached, on your own schedule.
Answers before the call.
See a cross-border join on your own issues.
Book a demo and we will show a live change in one jurisdiction correlated to its counterpart in another.
No obligation. 30 minutes, on your own jurisdictions.